356. From Deseret News: Defending the Faith: Book of Mormon and other hidden ancient documents
My husband, Wayne D Eckman, see blog #233 on Sept. 18, 2014, and blog # 109, Mar. 1, 2014 to see pictures of him and his twin brother Blaine, and more. He absolutely loves the Book of Mormon, and today I'm going over to see him in the Intensive Care Unit of the St. George Hospital. He has had problems with his lungs, kidneys and a blood clot, etc. He is improving, but last night he asked me to bring a Book of Mormon today. He has been talking in the ICU to someone he wants to give a Book of Mormon to!
This comes from LDS Living, and was published first in the Deseret News, Thursday, Feb. 5, 2015. I love any new information about the Book of Mormon. Defending the Faith: Book of Mormon and other hidden ancient documents
This comes from LDS Living, and was published first in the Deseret News, Thursday, Feb. 5, 2015. I love any new information about the Book of Mormon. Defending the Faith: Book of Mormon and other hidden ancient documents
Dan Peterson cites scholarship arguing that the coming forth of the Book of Mormon follows an ancient pattern.
Deseret News archives
In the late 1820s, when Joseph Smith announced that he’d recovered an ancient book that had been written on metal plates and concealed by one of its authors in a stone box, his claim was widely derided. It still is.
But the idea of an ancient book hidden up to come forth at a future time no longer seems quite so ridiculous — not, at least, to those who’ve been following the relevant archaeological developments.
In 1945, for example, a number of Christian manuscripts were found in Egypt at Nag Hammadi, ancient Chenoboskion. Dating to the fifth century A.D. and including writings purporting to be from Jesus Christ’s apostles, they’d been hidden in a pottery jar and buried in the ground.
Two or three years later, an even larger and older collection, this time of ancient Jewish documents, began to be discovered in caves located at or near Qumran, on the western shore of the Dead Sea. A fragment, at least, of every book of the Old Testament was eventually found among the documents — the brief book of Esther being the only omission — along with many other important ancient texts.
One of the latter, the so-called “Copper Scroll,” was written on a rolled metal plate, and, intriguingly, it described where various treasures, including other books, were to be located. (Unfortunately, the clues are so obscure to us today that, thus far, those other items haven’t been found.)
At this point, scholars are aware of numerous ancient document burials in stone boxes, and of many ancient texts, religious and otherwise, that are inscribed upon metal plates. In 2000, John Tvedtnes (formerly a member of the staff of the Maxwell Institute at BYU) published “The Book of Mormon and Other Hidden Books,” in which he discusses specific examples of such writings and such burials from across the ancient and medieval Near East.
Another of Joseph Smith’s claims that continues to meet with derision says that the Book of Mormon was originally written in “reformed Egyptian.” Some critics have made merry over this, describing “reformed Egyptian” as a mythical language that never existed. In a series of articles and a book (“Delusions”) published already in 1831-1832, Alexander Campbell scoffed at the idea of a record having been translated “from the reformed Egyptian!!!”
Moreover, virtually since the publication of the Book of Mormon in 1830, critics have mocked the sheer thought that an ancient Hebrew would ever write anything sacred in the language of the hated pagan Egyptians, Israel’s longtime enemies. Most serious, believing students of the Book of Mormon, by contrast, have taken the term to refer not to a separate language but to a non-Hebrew script that, they suggest, was used to record Lehi’s and Nephi’s native early Hebrew.
Only in the 20th century — far too late for Joseph to have borrowed the idea from them — did ancient Hebrew texts begin to be found that had been written in Egyptian script. Some come from the very time of Lehi. Most are magical incantations in which, while the underlying language is an early form of Hebrew or (closely related) Canaanite, the script is hieratic Egyptian, a cursive (or, one might say, “reformed”) variant of the hieroglyphs with which most of us are familiar. Papyrus Amherst 63, a fourth-century B.C. document written in yet another cursive (or “reformed”) Egyptian script, called “demotic,” includes an Aramaic version of Psalm 20:2-6. Strikingly, this papyrus represents the second-oldest known biblical text.
The third-oldest biblical texts are the Dead Sea Scrolls, already mentioned above. But the very earliest biblical manuscripts known to scholars were found in a tomb in Jerusalem in 1980. Dated to the time of Lehi — that is, to the end of the seventh century before Christ — they’re in the form of two rolled silver leaves that have been inscribed with the well-known “priestly blessing” ofNumbers 6:24-26.
For an accessible discussion of these and other interesting related topics, see John A. Tvedtnes’ “Ancient Texts in Support of the Book of Mormon,” in Donald W. Parry, Daniel C. Peterson and John W. Welch’s “Echoes and Evidences of the Book of Mormon” (Provo: FARMS, 2006).
Tvedtnes’ conclusion is worth noting: “The fact,” he says, “that the three earliest known manuscripts with Bible text are, respectively, written on metallic plates, written in a reformed Egyptian script reflecting an underlying Semitic language, and hidden away for future discovery demonstrates that the Book of Mormon fits an ancient pattern.”
Daniel Peterson teaches Arabic studies, founded BYU’s Middle Eastern Texts Initiative, directsMormonScholarsTestify.org, chairsmormoninterpreter.com, blogs daily atpatheos.com/blogs/danpeterson, and speaks only for himself.
Comments